Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Dec;100(12):1377–1383. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31537-6

Table 3.

Residents and medical student rotations transitioned geographically by hospital type, state and city

Program Yr 07–08 Residents Transferred
after Hospital Closure
Medical Student
Rotations Transferred
after Hospital Closure
City
   Within South Los Angeles 0% (0/180) 40% (10/24)*
   Other areas of Los Angeles County but outside
     South Los Angeles
31% (55/180) 60% (14/24)*
State
   Within California 54% (97/180)* 100% (24/24)
   Outside of California 46% (83/180)* 0% (0/24)
Hospital Type
   Public hospital 13% (23/180)* 71% (17/24)§
   Other hospital settings 87% (157/180)* 29% (7/24)*

All statistical tests were performed using 1-sided Fisher’s exact test for significance comparing posthospital closure to prehospital closure;

*

p<0.001

§

p=0.001

Nonsignificant change. Source: Charles Drew University, Office of the College of Medicine Dean.