Skip to main content
. 2010 May 14;86(5):730–742. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.003

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Illustration of λS for a Tag SNP and a Synthetic Causal Marker

The relationship between λS for a tag SNP with MAF = 30% and the true λS for a synthetic causal marker is shown, with MAF ranging from 1% to 10% (each dot represents 1% increase), under three effect sizes with multiplicative genetic models. In all cases, the tag SNP underestimates the familial aggregation explained by the true causal variant.