Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Rev Econ Househ. 2009 Sep 1;7(3):323–339. doi: 10.1007/s11150-009-9057-6

Table 4.

Predicted Effects of Family Structure on Caregiving Efforts of Nondisabled (ND) Spouse to Disabled (D) Spouse

Model A No Children Any Children
Hours of Spousal Care 13.4 23.0**
Proportion of total care by spouse 93.0% 89.4%
Model B No Children Stepchildren Joint Children

Hours of Spousal Care 13.6* 27.1 22.2
Proportion of total care by spouse 93.0% 89.3% 90.1%
Model C No Children Step low attachment Step high attachment Joint Children

Hours of Spousal Care 13.3* 17.4 28.5 22.3
Proportion of total care by spouse 92.9% 87.2% 90.7% 89.3%
Model D No Children Step low attachment Nondisabled Parent Step low attachment to Disabled Parent Step high attachment Joint Children

Hours of Spousal Care 13.2* 8.9* 27.8 28.1 22.4
Proportion of total care by spouse 92.9% 87.2% 87.1% 90.7% 89.3%

Notes: Italic bold headings indicate the reference category. Family structure is displayed hierarchically from left to right according to degree of attachment between adult children and their elderly parent(s).

**

Denotes differences from reference category that are statistically significant at p≤0.10;

*

at 0.10>p≤0.15 level.