Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Rev. 2010 Apr;117(2):309–348. doi: 10.1037/a0018526

Table A1.

Predictions from the EBRW Model of Mean RT Interaction Contrasts and Error Rates for the LL Stimulus as a Function of c and A.

A
3 4 5 6 7 8
c
1.2 −41.8 −18.4 4.3 24.6 41.9 56.3
.37 .33 .29 .25 .22 .19
1.4 −27.0 −.1 23.5 42.7 57.7 69.2
.32 .26 .22 .18 .14 .11
1.6 −14.4 14.0 36.6 53.5 65.7 74.4
.27 .21 .16 .12 .09 .06
1.8 −3.9 24.4 45.0 59.3 68.8 75.2
.22 .16 .11 .08 .05 .04
2.0 4.6 31.8 50.0 61.6 68.8 73.3
.19 .12 .08 .05 .03 .02
2.2 11.3 36.7 52.3 61.6 67.0 70.1
.15 .09 .05 .03 .02 .01
2.4 16.4 39.6 52.8 60.1 64.0 66.1
.12 .07 .04 .02 .01 .01
2.6 20.1 41.0 52.1 57.6 60.4 61.8
.10 .05 .02 .01 .01 .00
2.8 22.8 41.3 50.4 54.6 56.5 57.4
.08 .03 .02 .01 .00 .00
3.0 24.4 40.8 48.1 51.3 52.6 53.2
.06 .02 .01 .00 .00 .00
3.2 25.3 39.6 45.5 47.9 48.8 49.1
.05 .02 .01 .00 .00 .00
3.4 25.6 38.0 42.7 44.5 45.0 45.3
.04 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00
3.6 25.5 36.2 39.9 41.1 41.5 41.6
.03 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00
3.8 25.0 34.1 37.0 37.9 38.2 38.2
.02 .01 .00 .00 .00 .00
4.0 24.2 32.0 34.3 34.9 35.0 35.1
.02 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
4.2 23.2 29.8 31.6 32.0 32.1 32.2
.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
4.4 22.1 27.7 29.0 29.4 29.4 29.4
.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
4.6 20.9 25.6 26.7 26.9 26.9 26.9
.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00
4.8 19.7 23.6 24.4 24.6 24.6 24.6
.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

Note. Top line in each cell gives the mean RT interaction contrast. Bottom line in each cell gives the error rate on the LL stimulus. Hashed lines at upper left of table demarcate the region where the LL stimulus has a predicted error rate greater than .20.