Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Apr 9;167(7):716–721. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.7.716

Table 1.

Alcohol Misuse Outcomes by Smoking Status

Smoking Status Full Sample
Drinkers Only Sample
All Any Alcohol Diagnosis a
Hazardous Drinking b
All Hazardous Drinking c
no yes OR (95% CI) no yes OR (95% CI) no yes OR (95% CI)








All (%) 42,374 (100.0%) 39,091 (91.5%) 3,283 (8.5%) 32,252 (73.9%) 10,122 (26.1%) 26,511 (100.0%)
(65.5%)
16,389 (60.1%) 10,122 (39.9%)
Never smoker 24,533 (56.0%) 23,312 (94.6%) 1,221 (5.4%) ref d 20,333 (80.8%) 4,200 (19.2%) ref 5,052 (50.5%) 9,532 (67.6%) 4,200 (32.4%) ref
Former smoker 8,012 (19.5%) 7,574 (94.3%) 438 (5.7%) 1.06 (0.93–1.21) 6,359 (78.0%) 1,653 (22.0%) 1.19* (1.10–1.28) 5,221 (20.2%) 3,568 (67.6%) 1,653 (32.4%) 1.00 (0.92–1.09)
Daily smoker 8,166 (20.6%) 6,884 (83.2%) 1,282 (16.8%) 3.52* (3.19–3.90) 4,771 (56.6%) 3,395 (43.4%) 3.23* (3.02–3.46) 6,131 (24.1%) 2,736 (43.2%) 3,395 (56.8%) 2.74* (2.54–2.95)
Occasional smoker 1,663 (3.9%) 1,321 (76.5%) 342 (23.5%) 5.39* (4.60–6.31) 789 (44.2%) 874 (55.8%) 5.33* (4.70–6.04) 1,427 (5.2%) 553 (36.3%) 874 (63.7%) 3.65* (3.18–4.19)

Note: Unadjusted observation count is shown. All relative frequencies were calculated using sample weights.

a

Any alcohol diagnosis includes both alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence vs. no diagnoses

b

Full sample compares hazardous drinkers vs. non-hazardous drinkers + abstainers

c

Drinkers only sample compares hazardous drinkers vs. non-hazardous drinkers

d

Never smokers were reference category for logistic regression

*

p<.001 compared to Never smokers