Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 24;25(6):517–523. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1275-3

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics by Patient Decision-Making Role Preference

Total sample Preference for provider to make decisions (n = 100) Preference for shared decision-making (n = 314) Preference for patient to make decisions (n = 20)
Patient characteristics (n = 434) a
Age–years
Mean (SD) 45.4 (9.4) 43.1 (9.3) 46.0 (9.4) 46.6 (8.6)
Gender (%)
Female 34.0 31.3 36.0 15.0
Race (%)
Non-Hispanic White 23.3 31.0 20.1 35.0
African American 57.6 44.0 d 63.4 35.0
Latino 13.8 21.0 11.8 10.0
Other 5.3 4.0 4.8 20.0
High school degree (%)
Yes 72.4 78.0 70.7 70.0
Employment status (%)
Working 25.4 30.0 25.2 5.0
On HAART (%) f
Yes 78.6 73.2 80.3 79.0
Viral load (%)
≤400 63.1 60.8 62.8 79.0
Depression-CESD10 (%) b
≥10 58.3 72.0 d 54.5 50.0
Alcohol use (%)
Never 40.6 37.0 43.3 15.0
Former 49.5 48.0 48.4 75.0
Current 9.9 15.0 75.0 10.0
Active drug use (%)
Yes 28.8 36.0 25.8 40.0
Length of provider-patient relationship (%)
>5 years 33.3 30.6 33.8 40.0
Overall satisfaction with care (%)
Highest rating 62.0 70.0 60.5 45.0
Communication about decision-making (%) c
Highest rating 37.2 26.3 d 40.8 35.0
Provider characteristics (n = 45)
Age–years
Mean (SD) 44.5 (8.1) 46.5 (8.0) 43.9 (8.2) 44.2 (7.2)
Gender (%)
Female 55.6 53.0 59.2 60.0
Race (%)
Non-Hispanic White 70.7 82.0 66.2 85.0
Asian 20.3 14.0 22.9 10.0
Other 9.0 4.0 10.8 5.0

Analysis of variance was calculated for continuous variables, and chi-squared tests were used for dichotomous variables. P values are based on bivariate analysis conducted using multinomial logistic regression and accounted for clustering by site and provider. Preference for shared decision-making was used as the reference category

aBecause of missing data, the total sample size for individual patient variables ranged from 432 to 434

bCESD10 refers to the validated, shorter version of the CESD scale for depression. Patients with scores of 10 or above are considered depressed

cPerceived quality of provider communication about decision-making was assessed through patient ratings on the 6-item decision-making subscale of the Interpersonal Processes of Care Survey

dp < 0.05; compared to preference for shared decision-making

ep < 0.01; compared to preference for shared decision-making

fEstimates include the entire sample. There were also no differences in decision-making role preference for patients when limiting the comparison to those on HAART with those eligible (based on CD4 < 350) yet not on HAART