TABLE 2.
The expected rates (r/U) for simulations using scaled parameters for the D. miranda neo-Y
|
L (kb) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 192 | 320 | 640 | 1280 | ||
| U = 3.78, s = 0.63 | N0 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| r/U (Gessler) | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.50 | 0.33 | |
| r/U (Equations 2 with TA correction) | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.19 | |
| U = 2.5, s = 0.63 | N0 | 2.04 | 0.76 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 0.26 |
| r/U (Gessler) | NA | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.33 | |
| r/U (Equations 2 with TA correction) | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.18 | |
| U = 1.89, s = 0.63 | N0 | 5.38 | 1.99 | 1.29 | 1.05 | 0.67 |
| r/U (Gessler) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.17 | |
| r/U (Equations 2 with TA correction) | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.15 | |
Expected rates were calculated using both the method of Gessler (1995) and Equations 2 (with the addition of TA), including the effects of BGS on the value of Ne. The corresponding rates for the simulations are shown in Figure 2.