TABLE 2.
Effects of QTL in the final multitrait MIM model of log relative fitness in each individual environment
| LG 1: |
LG 7: |
LG 13: |
% variance explained | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 cM | 45 cM | 47 cM | LG 1 × LG 7 | ||
| Hopland 2003 | 0.1170 | −0.1340 | 0.0288 | 0.1026 | 16.06 |
| Hopland 2004 | 0.0690 | −0.1120 | −0.1744 | 0.2524 | 4.97 |
| Hopland 2006 | 0.3012 | −0.3665 | 0.0307 | 0.6908 | 41.27 |
| Hopland 2007 | 0.2828 | −0.2105 | −0.4792 | 0.3874 | 19.26 |
| Sierra 2003 | 0.1063 | −0.1270 | −0.0090 | 0.2825 | 31.30 |
| Sierra 2004 | 0.1411 | −0.3466 | −0.1521 | 0.1171 | 15.30 |
| Sierra 2006 | 0.3199 | −0.3140 | −0.0479 | 0.5407 | 30.54 |
| Sierra 2007 | 0.2800 | −0.4174 | −0.1360 | 0.2353 | 29.92 |
A positive additive effect indicates that the allele inherited from the xeric parent increased the trait. A positive epistatic effect indicates that the parental combination of alleles increased the trait. Statistically significant effects are highlighted in boldface type. Percentage of variance explained is total across all QTL effects.