Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 31;163(2):335–340. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1605-5

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The initial proportion (+SEM) of IG-prey on the treated patch. See legend to Fig. 1 for further explanation. For each treatment, the observed distributions were tested against a random distribution (proportion of 0.5) with a t test: ns not significant; P > 0.05; **P < 0.005; ***P < 0.0001. Different letters above each bar indicate significant differences among the treatments (GLM, P < 0.0001)