Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 19;11:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-25

Table 4.

The ASE pattern of genes reaching statistical significance (Illumina Assay).

rsID Name Chr Imprinting status Average intensity >11.25 Number of hets Number of hets with p < 0.01 Pattern of ASE Alleles
rs1802710 DLK1 14 control 13.57 15 14 imprinting
rs8100247 ZNF331 19 control 12.61 13 12 imprinting
rs2075745 H19 11 control 14.01 12 12 imprinting
rs2839702 H19 11 control 13.48 11 11 imprinting
rs1082 PHACTR2 6 candidate 12.09 14 10 partial imprinting
rs12982082 ZNF331 19 control 12.27 12 10 imprinting
rs13073 PEG10 7 control 12.09 11 10 imprinting
rs1055359 PEG3 19 control 11.8 10 10 imprinting
rs9373409 PLAGL1 6 control 12.48 11 9 imprinting
rs1860565 PEG3 19 control 13.63 9 9 imprinting
rs2309428 TJP2 9 candidate 12.86 9 8 random ASE
rs178077 SNAP29 22 candidate 11.95 10 7 random ASE
rs1003483 IGF2AS 11 control 11.32 8 7 imprinting
rs8585 UBE2V1 20 candidate 12.36 13 6 preferential A>G
rs1130663 CD151 11 candidate 12.44 18 5 random ASE
rs4664114 FMNL2 2 candidate 11.51 14 5 random ASE
rs4944960 XRRA1 11 candidate 12.43 12 5 preferential G>C
rs2282336 TJP2 9 candidate 12.32 9 5 random ASE
rs6633 CDK2AP1 12 candidate 11.34 8 5 random ASE
rs4614 VPS11 11 candidate 13.09 13 4 random ASE
rs3817672 TFRC 3 candidate 12.07 13 4 * preferential T>C
rs2905 C14orf130 14 candidate 11.33 12 4 random ASE
rs12190287 TCF21 6 candidate 12.88 10 4 random ASE
rs3809865 ITGB3 17 candidate 12.09 10 4 random ASE
rs10863 MEST 7 control 12.32 4 4 imprinting
rs915894 NOTCH4 6 candidate 13.44 16 3 * preferential A>C
rs754615 CAST 5 candidate 13.71 14 3 preferential G>C
rs838896 SCARB1 12 candidate 12.62 10 3 random ASE
rs5758651 TCF20 22 candidate 12.4 10 3 random ASE
rs11699879 NCOA3 20 candidate 12.68 9 3 random ASE
rs838891 SCARB1 12 candidate 11.85 9 3 random ASE
rs2425009 MYH7B 20 candidate 11.68 9 3 random ASE
rs9749449 ZNF211 19 candidate 11.71 6 3 random ASE
rs4797 SQSTM1 5 candidate 14.48 18 2 preferential G>A
rs1128933 MAN2C1 15 candidate 12.71 16 2 preferential C>T
rs10277 SQSTM1 5 candidate 11.78 16 2 preferential G>A
rs2249057 NM_006031 21 candidate 13.31 13 2 * preferential C>A
rs7226091 MGC16597 17 candidate 11.83 13 2 * preferential C>G
rs1043618 HSPA1A 6 candidate 13.6 12 2 random ASE
rs17085249 ELL2 5 candidate 12.98 12 2 random ASE
rs2255255 CRNKL1 20 candidate 12.86 12 2 random ASE
rs2013162 IRF6 1 candidate 12.64 12 2 * preferential C>A
rs11121567 PGD 1 candidate 12.03 12 2 * preferential A>G
rs3780473 ACO1 9 candidate 11.67 12 2 random ASE
rs4669 TGFBI 5 candidate 13.27 11 2 random ASE
rs7242 SERPINE1 7 candidate 13.01 11 2 random ASE
rs2788478 FLJ10300 7 candidate 13.04 10 2 random ASE
rs2271108 DOCK5 8 candidate 12.85 10 2 random ASE
rs552282 PPFIA1 11 candidate 11.58 10 2 * preferential C>T
rs1044116 NOTCH3 19 candidate 12.21 9 2 random ASE
rs7204628 MGC24665 16 candidate 11.84 9 2 random ASE
rs844 FCGR2B 1 candidate 13.05 8 2 * preferential C>T
rs11156878 KIAA0391 14 candidate 12.15 5 2 random ASE
rs12780 PRDM8 4 candidate 12.02 5 2 random ASE
rs5919 ITGB3 17 candidate 11.55 4 2 random ASE
rs13390 PHLDA2 11 control 12.33 2 2 imprinting

All SNPs had an average intensity above 11.25 and all or a subset of heterozygous samples had a significant statistical ASE test (p < 0.01). For each SNP, the ASE pattern (see text for details) was subjectively determined by examination of the bar charts, designed as in Figure 4, for all heterozygous samples. In case of preferential expression, the allele that was more expressed is indicated in the last column. *For these SNPs, the preferential bias is weaker.