Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;41(2):424–436. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.065

Table 1. Input Data for ALE Meta-Analysis of LMIhand TMS Studies.

5 papers with 6 contrasts and 53 foci were included in the TMS meta-analysis (listed in alphabetical order by first author).

Author n Contrast Intensity (% MT) Frequency (Hz) Modality
Bestmann 12 Suprathreshold rTMS – Rest 110% 3.125 3T MRI
Bestmann 12 Subthreshold rTMS – Rest 90% 3.125 3T MRI
Denslow 11 TMS vs. Rest, Increases 110% 1.0 1.5T MRI
Siebner, 1999 12 rTMS vs. Rest 140% 2.0 18FDG PET
Siebner, 2000 8 Post-rTMS vs. Rest “just below” 100% 5.0 18FDG PET
Speer 10 Positive Correlations 80%-120% 1.0 H215O PET

n = number of subjects included in a given study; Intensity % MT = intensity at which TMS was delivered relative to each individual's relative percent of motor threshold.