Skip to main content
. 2010 May 17;5(5):e10667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010667

Table 3. Genus-like bacterial groups which showed differences in terms of prevalence between groups C (centenarians), F (elderly offspring of the centenarians), E (elderly), and Y (young adults).

Prevalence (%)
Phylum/order Genus-like phylogenetic group C F (FC, FN)A E Y
Actinobacteria Corynebacterium 90 90 (83, 100) 50 40
Micrococcaceae 90 76 (83, 67) 59 35
Asteroplasma Asteroplasma et rel. 48 38 (42, 33) 32 20
Bacilli Staphylococcus 100 100 (100, 100) 91 85
Clostridium cluster XI Peptostreptococcus anaerobius et rel. 76 100 (100, 100) 59 55
Peptostreptococcus micros et rel. 52 52 (67, 33) 18 15
Fusobacteria Fusobacterium 28 43 (50, 33) 5 5
Proteobacteria Alcaligenes faecalis et rel. 71 81 (92, 67) 50 35
Bilophila et rel. 90 86 (83, 89) 68 70
Campylobacter 29 33 (50, 11) 5 5
Desulfovibrio et rel. 90 90 (100, 78) 77 50
Escherichia coli et rel. 95 81 (75, 89) 77 70
Haemophilus 90 76 (75, 79) 68 55
Helicobacter 33 33 (50, 11) 5 5
Leminorella 95 76 (83, 67) 64 65
Moraxellaceae 48 38 (58, 11) 18 10
Oceanospirillum 57 76 (75, 78) 36 30
Proteus et rel. 90 76 (83, 67) 41 35
Pseudomonas 90 90 (83, 100) 77 45
Serratia 100 95 (92, 100) 77 70
Yersinia et rel. 95 86 (83, 89) 72 60
Spirochaetes Brachyspira 19 38 (50, 22) 9 0
A

Prevalence values of subsets of group F, FC (offspring who lived with their centenarian parents) and FN (offspring who do not live with their centenarian parents) are presented in between brackets.