Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroscience. 2010 Mar 25;168(1):11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.041

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of labeling in Zone I for Shank1 (A) and Shank2 (B), showing that label for Shank2 is localized closer to the PSD. Scale bar = 100 nm. C. Pooled results from all experiments expressed as percent of labeling in control (black bars labeled c (control), set at 100 percent). Normalization was necessary in pooling experiments because the overall level of labeling varied between experiments. After high K+, the percentage of Shank1 appearing in Zone I exceeded that of Shank2 (dark gray bars labeled K). In contrast, the label for Shank1 decreases more than that for Shank2 during the recovery period (light gray bars, labeled R).