Table 2.
Comparison of SIPs and eTBLAST in the detection of duplicate publications
| % | eTBLAST (ratio 0.46) | SIPs (ratio 0.1) |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity (recall) | 50.3 | 78.9 |
| Specificity | 99.8 | 99.6 |
| Positive predictive value (precision) | 87.8 | 84 |
| Negative predictive value | 99.3 | 99.4 |
| F-measure | 63.7 | 81.4 |
F-measure is the harmonic mean f precision and recall.