Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 21;7(2):583–595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7020583

Table 1.

Nutrition and lifestyle characteristics of British and Danish students.

Variable University of Chester (n = 866) University of Southern Denmark (n = 548) p value*

n % n %
Gender <0.001
  Female 626 76.7 267 48.7
  Male 239 23.3 281 51.3
Age (year) <0.001
  <20 241 27.8 29 5.3
  20–24 243 28.1 400 73.0
  25–29 78 9.0 70 12.8
  ≥30 304 35.1 49 8.9
Perceived stress
  Studies in general 408 49.0 245 45.5 0.201
  Housing 93 11.2 54 9.9 0.463
  Financial situation 354 42.8 181 33.2 <0.001
  Workload in addition to studying 415 49.2 80 15.0 <0.001
Nutrition score
  High calorie diet score1 <0.001
    Low (1st tertile) 354 45.6 92 17.0
    Medium (2nd tertile) 243 31.3 233 42.9
    High (3rd tertile) 180 23.2 217 40.1
  Healthy diet score2 <0.001
    Low (1st tertile) 236 30.3 278 51.1
    Medium (2nd tertile) 213 27.3 136 25.0
    High (3rd tertile) 331 42.4 130 23.9
Quality of life 0.007
  Low 55 6.5 52 9.9
  Medium 243 28.9 119 22.7
  High 542 64.5 354 67.4
Social support 0.587
  Low (<3 persons) 284 33.7 174 32.3
  High (≥3 persons) 559 66.3 365 67.7
Satisfaction with social support <0.001
  Low 75 8.9 31 5.7
  Medium 473 56.4 214 39.6
  High 290 34.6 295 54.6
*

χ2-test to compare the two study sites;

1

Low vitamins and minerals, high fat, high calorie;

2

High vitamins and minerals, high fiber, low fat, low calorie.