Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 8;7(3):870–926. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7030870

Table 3.

Empirical Estimates in Longitudinal Studies: Alcohol.

Study [ref. no.] Drinking Onset Drinking Behaviors
Marketing exposure Odds ratio (95% CI) Marketing exposure Odds ratio (95% CI)
Casswell et al. [75] Liking ofads 1.60 (0.96, 2.70)
Collins et al. [77] ESPN-TV beer ads 1.08 (0.83, 1.42)
Collins et al. [77] TV sports beer ads 1.19 (1.01, 1.40)
Collins et al. [77] Other TV beer ads 1.13 (0.95, 1.34)
Collins et al. [77] Magazine reading 0.96 (0.87, 1.06)
Collins et al. [77] Hours radio listening 1.17 (1.00, 1.37)
Collins et al. [77] Beer concessions 1.01 (0.91, 1.13)
Collins et al. [77] In-store beer ads 1.03 (0.92, 1.14)
Collins et al. [77] Beer merchandise 1.76 (1.23, 2.52)
Collins et al. [77] Hours TV viewing 0.86 (0.73, 1.03)
Ellickson et al. [79] TV beer ads 1.05 (0.64, 1.70)
Ellickson et al. [79] Magazines with ads 1.12 (0.94, 1.30)
Ellickson et al. [79] Beer concessions 1.06 (0.83, 1.40)
Ellickson et al. [79] In-store displays 1.42 (1.10, 1.80)
Ellickson et al. [79] Weekly TV viewing 0.78 (0.69, 0.88)
Fisher et al. [80] Boys-alcohol merchandise 1.78 (1.36, 2.33) Boys-alcohol merchandise 0.87 (0.51, 1.48)
Fisher et al. [80] Boys-awareness of ads 1.27 (0.98, 1.64) Boys-awareness of ads 0.98 (0.58, 1.66)
Fisher et al. [80] Girls-alcohol merchandise 1.74 (1.37, 2.19) Girls - alcohol merchandise 1.79 (1.16, 2.77)
Fisher et al. [80] Girls-awareness of ads 1.04 (0.84, 1.29) Girls-awareness of ads 1.16 (0.77, 1.74)
Hanewinkel et al. [81] Parents don’t limit movies 2.53 (1.55, 4.12)
Hanewinkel & Sargent [82] Hours of movie alcohol use 1.44 (0.96, 2.17)
Hanewinkel & Sargent [82] Hours of movie alcohol use 1.42 (1.16, 1.75) Hours of movie alcohol use 1.95 (1.27, 3.00)
Hanewinkel & Sargent [82] Hours TV viewing 0.99 (0.75, 1.31) Hours TV viewing 0.76 (0.48, 1.19)
Henriksen et al. [83] Beer brand recognition 1.07 (0.93, 1.23) Beer brand recognition 1.13 (0.93, 1.38)
Henriksen et al. [83] Beer brand recall 1.10 (0.97, 1.25) Beer brand recall 1.11 (0.94, 1.33)
Henriksen et al. [83] Receptivity: moderate 1.20 (0.75, 1.90) Receptivity: moderate 1.19 (0.62, 2.26)
Henriksen et al. [83] Receptivity: high 1.68 (1.20, 2.35) Receptivity: high 1.62 (1.01, 2.60)
McClure et al. [84] Alcohol merchandise 1.50 (1.10, 2.00)
McClure et al. [85] Alcohol merchandise 1.41 (0.98, 2.01) Alcohol merchandise 1.80 (1.28, 2.54)
McClure et al. [85] Alcohol merchandise 1.57 (0.99, 2.50) Alcohol merchandise 1.44 (0.90, 2.31)
Robinson et al. [87] TV viewing 1.09 (1.01, 1.18) Hours TV viewing 1.01 (0.93, 1.11)
Robinson et al. [87] Music TV videos 1.31 (1.17, 1.47) Music TV videos 1.05 (0.95, 1.17)
Robinson et al. [87] VCR videos 0.89 (0.79, 0.99) VCR videos 0.97 (0.86, 1.10)
Robinson et al. [87] Computer games 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) Computer games 1.00 (0.89, 1.12)
Sargent et al. [88] Hours of movie alcohol use 1.15 (1.06, 1.25)
Stacy et al. [90] TV ads: beer 1.44 (1.27, 1.61)
Stacy et al. [90] TV sports ads: beer 1.20 (1.05, 1.37)
Stacy et al. [90] Ad exposure: beer 1.21 (1.04, 1.41)
Stacy et al. [90] Brand recall: beer 1.17 (0.97, 1.38)
Stacy et al. [90] TV ads: wine/liquor 1.34 (1.17, 1.52)
Stacy et al. [90] TV sports ads: wine/liquor 1.00 (0.88, 1.15)
Stacy et al. [90] Ad exposure: wine/liquor 1.18 (0.98, 1.32)
Stacy et al. [90] Brand recall: wine/liquor 1.07 (0.91, 1.26)
Stacy et al. [90] TV ads: 3-drink episodes 1.26 (1.08, 1.48)
Stacy et al. [90] TV sports ads: 3-drink episodes 1.07 (0.91, 1.26)
Stacy et al. [90] Ad exposure: 3-drink episodes 1.06 (0.89, 1.27)
Stacy et al. [90] Brand recall: 3-drink episodes 1.17 (0.91, 1.44)

Notes: Bold entries are statistically significant; 95% confidence interval (CI) in parentheses. Table values for Ellickson et al. [79] are based on data and information provided by Phyllis Erickson. Additional calculations computed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis v2.2; see [51] for details.