Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2009 Jun 1;115(11):2410–2419. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24256

Table 3.

Estimated values (confidence interval) for sensitivity of FOBT and duration of preclinical CRC for three sensitivity hypotheses

Parameters Hypothesis A Hypothesis B Hypothesis C
Average duration in years
Dukes A 1.6 (1.4-1.8) 3.8 (3.3-4.2) 2.5 (2.3-2.8)
Dukes B 2.1 (1.9-2.5) 2.4 (2.1-2.7) 2.5 (2.2-3.0)
Dukes C 4.0 (3.2-4.6) 3.6 (3.0-4.3) 3.7 (3.1-4.7)
Dukes D 3.2 (2.2-4.3) 2.1 (1.4-2.8) 1.5 (1.2-2.7)
Total* 6.0 (5.2-6.9) 8.0 (7.1-9.0) 6.7 (5.8-7.7)
Sensitivity unrehydrated FOBT (%):
Dukes A 33 (30-37) 13 (12-16)
Dukes B 33 (30-37) 35 (33-42)
Dukes C 33 (30-37) 38 (36-44)
Dukes D 33 (30-37) 66 (61-76)
Stage of clinical diagnosis 51 (47-65)
Earlier stages 19 (16-25)

FOBT: Fecal Occult Blood Test

CRC: Colorectal Cancer

Hypothesis A: same sensitivity of FOBT for all cancer stages.

Hypothesis B: sensitivity different for each cancer stage.

Hypothesis C: sensitivity of FOBT different in stage of clinical diagnosis than in earlier stages.

*

Calculated as (% in stage A * duration A) + (% in stage B * duration A+B) + (% in stage B * duration A+B+C) + (% in stage D * duration A+B+C+D)

For the Minnesota trial sensitivity of rehydrated FOBT were: 28% for Hypothesis A; 10% Dukes A, 26% Dukes B, 56% Dukes C and 63% Dukes D for Hypothesis B; 55% stage of clinical diagnosis, 10% earlier stages for Hypothesis C.