Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Jun;40(6):665–676. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0914-1

Table 4.

Interests and difference in interests by diagnostic group

Variable Full sample statistics
Ms for diagnostic groups
η2 p
M SD Range AU30 DS30 TD18
Director 2.7 0.39 1.8–3.8 2.4a 2.8b 2.8b .14 < .001
Old objects 2.7 0.40 1.8–3.7 2.9a 2.6b 2.7ab .05 .080
New objects 2.9 0.40 1.8–3.8 2.7a 2.9ab 2.9b .06 .035
Old objects-director −0.01 0.57 −1.4–1.6 0.42a −0.15b −0.12b .16 < .001
New objects-director 0.15 0.48 −1.3–1.6 0.24 0.11 0.13 .01 .55
New–old objects 0.16 0.62 −1.6–1.9 −0.18a 0.25b 0.24b .08 .013

AU Autism, DS Down syndrome, and TD typical development group; subscripts refer to average age (in months) at observation. For the first two balance variables (rows four and five), positive values indicate stronger interest in the objects than the director. For the last balance variable (row six), positive values indicate stronger interest in the new, unfamiliar objects than the old, familiar ones. n = 23, 29, and 56 for AU, DS, and TD groups, respectively. Means that do not differ significantly per Tukey post hoc test, p <. 05, share a common subscript. Effect size (η2) and exact p-value are from a one-way analysis of variance