Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 10;25(6):1561–1568. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq090

Table II.

Association between infant leukemia and latent class measure of infertility.

Controls
Cases
ORa 95% CI MLL+
ORa 95% CI MLL−
ORa 95% CI
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Combined leukemia Latent class infertility
 No 266 (82.1) 372 (84.0) Ref 192 (84.2) Ref 121 (82.9) Ref
 Yes 58 (17.9) 71 (16.0) 0.97 0.63–1.48 36 (15.8) 0.98 0.58–1.65 25 (17.1) 1.13 0.63–2.01
ALL Latent class infertility
 No 266 (82.1) 217 (82.2) Ref 131 (83.4) Ref 62 (80.5) Ref
 Yes 58 (17.9) 47 (17.8) 1.27 0.79–2.05 26 (16.6) 1.20 0.68–2.13 15 (19.5) 1.40 0.69–2.85
AML Latent class infertility
 No 266 (82.1) 149 (86.6) Ref 59 (86.8) Ref 56 (84.8) Ref
 Yes 58 (17.9) 23 (13.4) 0.65 0.36–1.18 9 (13.2) 0.70 0.29–1.67 10 (15.2) 0.89 0.40–2.02

ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; MLL, mixed lineage leukaemia.

aLogistic regression models were adjusted for year of birth (quartiles), maternal age (continuous), maternal education, maternal race, smoking during pregnancy, household income, gestational age and birthweight.