Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Mar 15;51(4):1345–1359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.018

Table 7.

Mean (SD) annualised percentage rates of atrophy in the left hippocampus in the baseline images of the subset of 15 subjects used to assess optimal methods and parameters.

Control (n=5) MCI (n=5) AD (n=5)

manual 1.53 (2.27) 4.73 (2.02) 5.44 (1.90)

manualHBSI 1.28 (4.19) 4.89 (2.81) 6.97 (1.40)

MAPS-HBSI 1.49 (3.87) 5.18 (2.80) 6.48 (1.06)

manualHBSI vs manual
difference in means
(95% CI)
-0.26 (-4.36 to 3.85),
p=0.87
0.16 (-1.89 to 2.2)
p=0.84
1.53 (0.27 to 2.79)
p=0.03
SD of the difference 3.33 1.65 1.01
SD ratio (95% CI) 1.85 (0.58 to 5.91)
p=0.25
1.39 (0.55 to 3.51)
p=0.39
0.76 (0.31 to 1.72)
p=0.38

MAPS-HBSI vs manual
difference in means
(95% CI)
-0.04 (-3.90 to 3.81)
p=0.98
0.46 (-1.41 to 2.32)
p=0.53
1.05 (-0.97 to 3.06)
p=0.22
SD of the difference 3.10 1.50 1.62
SD ratio (95% CI) 1.71 (0.52 to 5.55)
p=0.31
1.38 (0.59 to 3.24)
p=0.35
0.56 (0.16 to 1.91)
p=0.30

MAPS-HBSI vs manualHBSI
difference in means (95% CI) 0.21 (-0.28 to 0.70)
p=0.30
0.30 (-0.61 to 1.20)
p=0.41
-0.48 (-1.94 to 0.97)
p=0.41
SD of the difference 0.40 0.73 1.17
SD ratio (95% CI) 0.92 (0.83 to 1.03)
p=0.10
0.99 (0.63 to 1.57)
p=0.97
0.76 (0.23 to 2.51)
p=0.59