Table 3.
Average AIC per site of FLU and other models. FLU has better AIC than other models.
| without F option | with F option | difference between | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (-F) | (+F) | +F and -F options | |
| FLU | -21.01 | -21.09 | -0.08 |
| HIVb | -21.31 | -21.34 | -0.03 |
| JTT | -21.37 | -21.37 | -0.00 |
| HIVw | -21.43 | -21.42 | 0.01 |
| CpREV | -21.49 | -21.54 | -0.05 |
| LG | -21.57 | -21.56 | 0.01 |
| WAG | -21.58 | -21.51 | 0.07 |
| VT | -21.79 | -21.68 | 0.11 |
| Dayhoff | -21.79 | -21.62 | 0.17 |
| DCMut | -21.79 | -21.62 | 0.17 |
| RtREV | -21.80 | -21.70 | 0.10 |
| Blosum62 | -21.85 | -21.82 | 0.03 |
| MtREV | -22.48 | -21.76 | 0.72 |
| MtMam | -22.73 | -21.97 | 0.76 |
| MtArt | -22.86 | -22.15 | 0.71 |