Table 7.
Comparisons of FLU and 14 other models in constructing maximum likelihood trees.
| LogLK/site | LogLK/site | |
|---|---|---|
| without F option (-F) | with F option (+F) | |
| FLU | -10.51 | -10.49 |
| HIVb | -10.65 | -10.61 |
| HIVw | -10.71 | -10.65 |
| JTT | -10.68 | -10.63 |
| LG | -10.78 | -10.82 |
| cpREV | -10.74 | -10.93 |
| WAG | -10.78 | -10.70 |
| Dayhoff | -10.89 | -10.71 |
| VT | -10.89 | -10.78 |
| Blosum62 | -10.92 | -10.72 |
| DCMut | -10.89 | -10.75 |
| RtREV | -10.89 | -10.85 |
| MtMam | -11.36 | -10.75 |
| MtREV | -11.23 | -11.01 |
| MtArt | -11.42 | -10.79 |
FLU trees have the highest average likelihoods.