Table 3. Summary of Hierarchical Regression Models Predicting Sibling’ Temporal Involvement as a Function of Sibling Differentiation Polynomials, Sex Constellation, and Differentiation X Sex Constellation Interactions (N = 136).
Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β |
Intercept | 564.18 ** | 44.87 | 593.94 ** | 46.94 | ||
Parents’ education | −9.44 | 23.95 | −.04 | −5.45 | 23.72 | −.02 |
Family income | −.00 | .00 | −.10 | −.00 | .00 | −.10 |
Parents’ job prestige | .00 | 3.30 | .00 | −.18 | 3.25 | −.01 |
Age spacing | −55.73** | 16.87 | −.30 | −49.68** | 16.82 | −.26 |
Older siblings’ residential status |
−235.44* | 106.92 | −.19 | −249.50* | 105.81 | −.21 |
Sex composition | −148 .72* | 57.78 | −.21 | −223.93** | 67.36 | −.31 |
Differentiation | 79.08* | 38.30 | .17 | 87.33 | 56.26 | .18 |
Differentiation2 | 12.07 | 32.07 | .03 | −41.46 | 41.71 | −.11 |
Differentiation X Sex composition |
−49.15 | 77.01 | −.07 | |||
Differentiation2 X Sex composition |
145.60* | 64.67 | .25 | |||
R 2 | .23 | .26 | ||||
F for change in R2 | 4.70** | 3.02* |
p < .10.
p < .05.
p < .01.