Skip to main content
. 2010 May 20;6(5):e1000784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000784

Figure 2. Model ingredients.

Figure 2

(A) Size of adapted receptor complex Inline graphic (total number of Tar and Tsr receptors per complex) as function of ambient concentration Inline graphic (corresponding to adapted methylation level Inline graphic). Individual complex sizes (symbols) were obtained by fitting MWC model to dose-response curves for addition of MeAsp. These values were fitted by a linear function (line). (A Inset) Energy contribution to receptor complex free energy from methylation level Inline graphic per receptor dimer. Shown are fitting parameters for Tar receptors from [41] (symbols), as well as linear fit Inline graphic (in units of Inline graphic with Inline graphic the Boltzmann constant and Inline graphic absolute temperature). (B) Profile of concentration step change as measured experimentally using fluorescent marker (solid black line) [23], exponential fit used in dynamic MWC model for WT1 MeAsp profile (gray line; rate constants Inline graphic and Inline graphic), and perfect step change (black dashed line). Addition and removal times are marked by arrows. (B Inset) Response of mixed receptor complex to MeAsp removal for perfect (black dashed line) and exponentially fitted step change (gray line). (C) Typical time courses of receptor complex activity in response to two different MeAsp concentration step changes, Inline graphic (top) and Inline graphic (bottom), at ambient concentration Inline graphic. Experimental FRET measurement (thin black line), as well as dynamic MWC model for precise (gray lines) and imprecise adaptation (black lines; Inline graphic and Inline graphic). FRET and receptor complex activities were normalized by adapted pre-stimulus values before addition of MeAsp.