Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 28;7(46):823–838. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0359

Figure 11.

Figure 11.

Mean number of banks failing as a function of γ and the WLS parameter β. (a) The case where WLS remain weak throughout successive bank collapses. This contrasts with figures 710, where WLS become ‘strong’ where they cause bank collapse (z = 4.8, WLS → WLS). (b) The case where WLS become ‘strong’ where they cause a bank collapse (z = 4.8, WLS → SLS). This is the same process as in figures 710.