Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec;122(2):110–121. doi: 10.1159/000163088

Table 1.

FISH analysis results

Phase I
Phase II
# BACs % # BACs %
Unique location consistent with assembly 1941 91.5% 2097 98.8%
Unique location on expected chromosome but position not consistent with assembly 3 0.1% 1 0.0%
Location consistent with assembly but with additional weak secondary signal 43 2.0% 3 0.1%
Location consistent with assembly but with additional strong secondary signal 49 2.3% 3 0.1%
Location consistent with assembly but with multiple secondary signals 14 0.7% 3 0.1%
Mapped to multiple centromeres 2 0.1% 0 0.0%
Location not consistent with assembly 27 1.3% 8 0.4%
No visible FISH signal after multiple attempts on unrelated dogs 40 1.9% 7 0.3%
Selected clone repeatedly failed in culture 3 0.1% 0 0.0%
Total 2122 100.0% 2122 100.0%