Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Vaccine. 2010 Mar 4;28(19):3333–3340. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.089

Table 4.

Parasitological evaluations of dogs in Trial #2

Parasitologya CS


Group D0 D30 D60 D90 D120 D150 D180 Day 0 Endpointb
Saline + Out Out Out Out Out Out 9 8
Saline + + + - Out Out Out 8 9
Saline + + Out Out Out Out Out 6 11
Saline + + + + Out Out Out 6 7
Saline + - - + + - - 3 4
Adjuvant + + - + - Out Out 8 6
Adjuvant + - - Out Out Out Out 7 10
Adjuvant + + - - ND + ND 7 3
Adjuvant + + + - - + - 6 3
Adjuvant + - + - - ND - 4 0
Vaccine + + + + Out Out Out 12 11
Vaccine + + Out Out Out Out Out 10 8
Vaccine + Out Out Out Out Out Out 8 12
Vaccine + - + Out Out Out Out 8 8
Vaccine + + - - - - - 7 2
Vaccine + ND ND - - - - 7 1
Vaccine + + - Out Out Out Out 6 10
Vaccine + - ND - - - - 6 6
Vaccine + - - + - - - 6 0
Vaccine + - - - - - - 5 1
a

Parasitology was performed by microscopic observation of a Giemsa-stained smear of spleen, lymph node or ear biopsy, or by culture of spleen aspirate: +, parasite detected in at least one of the samples; -, negative (no parasites detected) in the samples evaluated; ND, not done; Out, the dog was removed from the study either because of no improvement or death of the dog.

b

CS Endpoint, Clinical Score at the endpoint for each dog, either at the time of removal from the study or Day 180.