Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec;40(4):499–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.07.001

Table 3.

Manipulation check.

Total (N = 101) M (SD) Rumination (n = 32) M (SD) Memory integration (n = 35) M (SD) Control (n = 34) M (SD) Statistics
Concentration on task 84.0 (12.4) 83.3 (11.3) 82.6 (12.9) 86.0 (13.0) F(2, 95) = 1.79, p = .17, η2 = .04
Manipulation-related distress 24.9 (23.5) 32.2 (20.8) a 29.7 (25.1) a 13.1 (19.8) b F(2, 95) = 5.48, p < .01, η2 = .10
Drive to continue dwelling 2.2 (1.22) 2.5 (1.51) a 2.2 (1.03) b 1.9 (1.04) b F(2, 95) = 3.96, p < .05, η2 = .08
PTQ-S 27.8 (12.0) 32.1 (10.7) a 26.9 (12.6) b 24.5 (11.5) b F(2, 95) = 2.73, p = .07, η2 = .05
MIPQ 19.9 (7.9) 20.4 (5.2) a 25.4 (7.3) b 13.8 (6.3) c F(2, 95) = 27.51, p < .001, η2 = .37
Abstractness1 2.89 (.96) 2.07 (.81) t (59) = −3.65, p < .01
Unproductiveness1 .69 (.92) .06 (.23) t (63) = −3.90, p < .01
Repetitiveness1 .52 (.62) .20 (.38) t (63) = −2.50, p < .05
Catastrophizing1 .56 (.72) .17 (.41) t (59) = −2.70, p < .05

PTQ-S = Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire – State version; MIPQ = Memory Integration Processing Questionnaire; different superscripts denote differences between conditions at p < .05 or p < .10 if in parentheses.

1

Blind evaluations of thoughts reported in the short breaks during the thinking task.