Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Jul;90(1):327–337. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31290

Table 2.

Intensity data of the fluorescence emission of the lucifer yellow that had been taken up by the hybrid layers of the adhesives applied with the water-wet or ethanol-saturated dentin technique.

Water-wet echnique Intensity data obtained from the fluorescence emission of the images of each sub-group
#[1°-2/6] #[2°-2/6] #[3°-2/6] #[4°-2/6] #[5°-2/6] #[6°-2/6] #Mean-SEM [12–36]
Resin 1 2010 1876 2001 1886 1567 1912 1875 ± 43a
Resin 2 1559 1776 1991 1856 1577 1812 1762 ± 43a
Resin 3 1259 1172 1131 1251 1277 992 1168 ± 43b
Resin 4 1139 1112 981 1101 997 895 1038 ± 43b
Resin 5 1021 812 998 1111 977 1012 989 ± 43b
Single Bond Plus 1032 947 1010 1211 1212 1092 1084 ± 43b
Ethanol-saturated
technique# 		#[1°-2/6] #[2°-2/6] #[3°-2/6] #[4°-2/6] #[5°-2/6] #[6°-2/6] #Mean-SD [12–36]
Resin 1 510 203 98 119 67 312 218 ± 43c
Resin 2 91 120 81 119 111 67 98 ± 43c
Resin 3 104 112 79 109 102 94 100 ± 43c
Resin 4 114 122 57 69 130 79 95 ± 43c
Resin 5 110 59 98 121 79 82 91 ± 43c
Single Bond Plus 95 119 126 71 95 92 100 ± 43c
#

Number of the specimen and number of slabs/number of images per each sub-group elaborated for the quantification of the fluorescence emission intensity of the lucifer yellow that had been taken up by the hybrid layers (arbitrary fluorescence units per 2300 µm2).