Table 1.
Studies (1st author) | Technique | Port size (mm) | Number of associated stabbing incisions | Complete ring | Subcutaneous tissue inclusion | Tensionless knot tying | Protection of vas and vessels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harrison et al. 2005 [7] | SEAL | 2.7 | 2 (unilateral) | −, small gap | + | − | +, jump over them |
4 (bilateral) | |||||||
Ozgediz et al. 2007 [8] | SEAL | 2.7 | 2 (unilateral) | −, small gap | + | − | +, jump over them |
4 (bilateral) | |||||||
Patkowski et al. 2006 [9] | PIRS | 2.5 or 5 | 1 (unilateral) | −, small gap | + | − | +, jump over them |
2 (bilateral) | |||||||
Bharathi et al. 2008 [5] | Modified SEAL and dual encirclage | 5 | At least 3 (unilateral) | + | + | +, hydrodissection | +, hydrodissection |
At least 6 (bilateral) | |||||||
Chang et al. 2008 [10] | Hooked pin method | 5 | 1 (unilateral) | + | + | +, hydrodissection | +, hydrodissection |
2 (bilateral) | |||||||
Chang et al. 2009 [11] | Hooked injection needle method | 5 | 1 (unilateral) | + | − | +, hydrodissection | +, hydrodissection |
2 (bilateral) |
SEAL: subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation; PIRS: percutaneous internal ring suturing.