Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Microsc. 2007 Nov;228(Pt 2):139–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01838.x

Table 2.

Comparison of energy transfer efficiency (E%) using various methods for selected FRET standards and cells. sFRET: contaminated with acceptor bleedthrough, ASBT. (number of cells, 12).

FRET Pair sFRET (%) psFRET (%) PFRET (%) sRET (%) FLIM-FRET (%)
CTV 18 (±6) 7 (±4) 8 (±2) 7 (±5) 8 (±2)
CVC 52 (±5) 43 (±3) 44 (±4) 40 (±5) 42 (±3)
CFP + YFP-C/EBPα 41 (±4) 26 (±3) 23 (±5) 26 (±3)
CFP – C/EBPα + YFP-Pit-1 31 (±4) 14 (±3) 13 (±3) 16 (±4)