Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Rhythm. 2009 Jul 16;6(10):1475–1482. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.07.014

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

A. Comparison of CL estimates obtained using the DF and CFE methods at varying sensitivity levels. B. Percentage of positive detections of CL<120 ms as function of the fast component contribution. For instance, out of 100 signals of G80 ms = 0.3 (and G180 ms = 0.7), the DF method detected positively about 10 signals (10%) as being <120 ms.