Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):439–449. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.030

Appendix 1: Summary of active monitoring studies without a predefined measure of disease progression (1988-2004) (ordered by stage & publication yr).

1st author, setting
(year published)
N (yrs
recruited)
Eligibility Median
age ±
SD
(range)
Median
initial PSA,
ng/ml
(range)
Stage (%);
median
Gleason score
Median
follow-up
(range)
% choosing active
treatment during
follow-up
Reasons for abandoning
active monitoring
LOCALISED DISEASE ONLY (STAGE T1-T2)
El-Geneidy,
Portland VA
Medical Centre
(2004)6
175 (1993-
2000)
T1-T2 NXM0 71 (50-
86)
6.9 (0.5-76.5) T1 or T2 (31%
stage T1c); 6
3.3 yrs
(0.1-8.6)
22% PSA increase only: 32%; signs of local tumour
progression: 8%; pt wish, no evidence of
progression: 45%; unknown: 16%.
PSA DT < 3 yrs (in 23% of pts) was associated with
3 fold increased rate of active treatment (p < 0.02;
multivariable analysis).
Carter, Centre for
Prostate Disease
Research, (2003)7
313 (1991-
2002)
Age ≤ 70; Gleason ≤
6; no grade 4; PSA
≤ 20 ng/ml; ≤ 3 +
ve cores; stage ≤ 2
65 (41-
70)
5.1 (0.5-20) Low grade,
localised (60%
stage T1c); 5
3.8 yrs
(0.5-10.5)
57.3% and 73.2%
within 2 and 4 yrs
respectively
PSA DT < 2 yrs (in 22% of pts) was associated with
> 3 fold increased rate of active treatment (p <
0.0001; multivariable analysis).
Meng, CaPSURE
database (2003)8
457 (1989-
2001)
Stage ≤ 3a N0M0;
expectant initial
treatment
- - Localised (46%
stage T1); -
- 41% at median 1.7
yrs. Only 15% went
from low-
intermediate / high
risk on PSA criteria
In multivariable models, men aged ≥ 75, < college
educated, income < $30K, were 65%, 37% & 58%
less likely, respectively, to abandon watchful
waiting. Those with absolute PSA change from
base ≥ 2 ng/ml had 3 fold rate of active treatment.
Zeitman,
Massachusetts
General Hospital
(2001)9
198 (1990-
1999)
T1-T2NXM0, PSA <
20 ng/ml
71 6.6 Localised (21%
stage T1c); -
3.4 57% of those alive by
5 yrs; 74% of those
alive by 7 yrs.
Of treated pts 81% believed the physician initiated
therapy because of PSA increase or a nodule;
physicians recorded advocating treatment due to
clinical or biochemical progression in 24%.
Nam,Toronto,
(1998)10
141 (1990-
1995)
Clinically localised 69 (53-
80)
- Localised
disease (stage
not stated); -
1.7 yrs
(0.2-4.1)
48% underwent
radical surgery
Patient preference (none based on PSA velocity).
Gerber, Univ of
Chicago, (1998)5
49 (1989-
1996)
Stage T1-T2 71.9 ±
7.0 (55-
84)
12.3 ±11.1*
(1.1-49.0)
Localised (T1c:
47%); -
32 mo*
(12-69).
12% of those alive &
not lost to follow-up.
Patient preference – not based on uniform criteria.
INCLUDES LOCALLY ADVANCED/DISTANT METASTATIC DISEASE (STAGE T3-T4)
Ross, McGill
University,
Canada, (2004)12.
142 (1994-
?)
Clinically localised
prostate cancer
69* (51-
87)
8.1 (0.23-41) T1-T3 (54%
stage T1c); 57%
Gleason score
= 5-6
3.95 yrs
(0.3-13)
28% “The decision…was on an individual basis. No
specific criteria..”
Wu, Dept of
Defence Centre for
Prostate Disease
Research (2004)11
1,158
(1990-
2001)
Expectant initial
treatment; no
metastases
70.9 6.4 T1-T4 (53.6%
T1; 41.7% T2);
37.8% Gleason
= 5-6
2.8 yrs
(0.8-11.3)
39.1% In multivariable models, LogPSA and clinical stage
were positively associated, and age at diagnosis
was inversely associated, with active treatment

DRE: digital rectal examination; CaPSURE: Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavour. PSA DT: Prostate specific antigen doubling time.

Radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, hormonal treatment.

*

mean value used