Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 23;33(6):1269–1274. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2042

Table 3.

Lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis results

Lifetime probability of: A1C ≥7.0% cohort
A1C <7.0% cohort
Control CGM Control CGM
Blindness 14.56 12.00 16.19 13.96
Neuropathy 34.96 30.56 33.46 30.41
Amputation 10.53 9.13 12.92 11.73
Microalbuminuria 19.30 13.15 12.43 9.46
End-stage renal failure 4.41 2.37 2.4 1.44
Myocardial infarction 11.53 11.24 11.24 11.04
Ischemic heart disease 10.41 10.22 10.82 10.66
Congestive heart failure 2.08 2.04 1.67 1.65
Stroke 1.94 1.92 1.84 1.81
Life expectancy (means) 26.79 26.84 36.54 36.58
Discounted QALYs (means) 13.75 14.35 16.69 17.80
Difference in QALYs 0.60 1.11
Discounted direct costs (means) $159,748 $217,882 $200,384 $285,149
Discounted indirect costs (means) $441,322 $441,955 $1,911,155 $1,913,776
Discounted total costs (means) $601,070 $659,837 $2,111,539 $2,198,925
Difference in total costs $58,767 $87,386
ICER [means (95% CI)] $98,679 (−60,007 [fourth quadrant, dominant] to −86,582 [second quadrant, dominated]) $78,943 (14,644 [first quadrant] to −290,780 [second quadrant, dominated])

Experienced quality-of-life benefit was not statistically significant during the 6-month trial for the A1C ≥7.0% cohort. The A1C ≥7.0% cohort is only for those aged ≥25 years. Dominant, intervention improves health at a lower cost compared with control; Dominated, intervention worsens health at increased cost compared with control.