Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 25.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem J. 2010 Apr 28;428(1):1–10. doi: 10.1042/BJ20100270

Figure 4. Schematic representation of differing complexes formed between Rho* and Gt.

Figure 4

Light illumination triggers structural changes in Rho and allows the binding of Gt to the Rho*–Rho dimer. In the pathway on the right-hand side, activation of one Rho subunit in the dimer suffices to induce Gt association, which stimulates GDP release from the Gt nucleotide-binding pocket. This results in formation of the Rho*–Gte complex with a free nucleotide-binding pocket. However, loading of GTP causes complex dissociation. In the pathway on left-hand side, Rho*–Gte is accessible to hydroxylamine that promotes all-trans-retinylidene chromophore hydrolysis and dissociation from the chromophore-binding pocket. This results in formation of the complex with the empty chromophore-binding pocket and an empty nucleotide-binding pocket in Rhoe*–Gte. The Rhoe*–Gte complex can be regenerated with 11-cis-retinylidene resulting in a Rho–Gte complex that can be dissociated in the presence of GTP. Red ovals represent Rho in the dark state, yellow ovals represent photoactivated Rho* (Meta II), grey ovals represent opsin (Rhoe) and blue ovals represent heterotrimeric Gtαβγ. An animated version of this Figure is available at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/428/0001/bj4280001add.htm.