Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;45(3):633–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01103.x

Table 2.

Regression Estimates and Standard Errors for the Associations among Facility and Market Characteristics and Total Number of Hospital Days per Patient per Year at Risk

Probabilistic Patient Choice Adjusted Estimates
Actual Patient Choice Estimates
Coefficient (SE) p-Value Coefficient (SE) p-Value
Facility size (No. of patients)
0–35 (lower tier) 0 0
35–72 (mid tier) 0.041 (0.017) .017 −0.044 (0.013) .001
72+ (top tier) 0.14 (0.017) <.001 −0.021 (0.013) .10
Profit status 0.17 (0.048) <.001 0.098 (0.030) <.001
Chain affiliation 0.058 (0.040) .15 −0.0034 (0.020) >.20
Market competition–chain interaction −0.034 (0.050) >.20 0.00050 (0.079) >.20
Market competition* 0.23 (0.041) <.001 0.44 (0.071) <.001
For-profit market share −0.078 (0.047) .099 −0.039 (0.032) >.20
Chain market share −0.030 (0.041) >.20 0.042 (0.027) .13
Fraction of patients with private insurance
Nonprofit 0.089 (0.15) >.20 0.21 (0.11) .042
For-profit 0.10 (0.092) >.20 0.19 (0.055) <.001
*

Market competition is measured on a scale from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating higher level of competition. Its precise definition is 1 minus the Hirschman–Herfindahl index, a measure of market competition that also ranges from 0 to 1.