Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Water Health. 2010 Feb 3;8(3):466–478. doi: 10.2166/wh.2010.116

Table 3.

Levels of faecal bacterial indicators in various water type categories

Fecal indicator concentration (log cfu/100 ml)
TC FC E. coli CP SFB
Sampling
sites
PS (%) M R CV (%) PS (%) M R CV (%) PS (%) M R CV (%) PS (%) M R CV (%) PS (%) M R CV (%)
BL 100 2.1 1.3–3.5 38 100 1.9 1–2.5 37 72 1.2 0.0–1.9 102 61 1.0 0.0–2.5 177 0 nd* nd* nd
BH 100 2.7 1.3–3.8 31 100 2.3 1–2.9 23 88 1.8 0.0–2.7 54 66 1.3 0.0–2.9 184 0 nd nd nd
OP 100 5.8 4.5–6.1 9 100 4.7 3.8–5.5 14 83 4.3 0.0–5.3 23 100 3.7 2.5–4.3 23 72 3.2 0.0–5.0 126
US 100 7.5 6.5–7.9 7 100 6.4 4.9–7.3 7 94 6.0 0.0–6.7 12 100 5.1 3.0–5.8 11 88 4.4 0.0–5.5 23
DS 100 7.8 7.0–8.6 8 100 6.9 6.1–7.7 9 100 6.7 5.8–7.2 6 100 5.6 5.0–6.7 7 100 5.8 4.7–6.8 23
*

SFB were not detectable (nd) above the median detection limit of log 0.28 cfu/100 ml (range log 0.1–1.7 cfu/100 ml).

SFB were not detectable (nd) above the median detection limit of log 0.60 cfu/100 ml (range log 0.1–1.5 cfu/100 ml).

Abbreviations: For BL, BH, OP, US and DS see Table 2, TC, Total coliform; FC, Faecal coliform; CP, Clostridium perfringens; SFB, Sorbitol-fermenting Bifidobacteria; PS, Percentage positive samples; M, Median; R, Range; CV, Percentage non-parametric-based coefficient of variations for the pooled data set ((p75–p25)/p50 × 100 where p75 and p25 are 75 and 25 percentiles, respectively, while p50 is a median); n = 5 habitats × 18 single samples