Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Water Health. 2010 Feb 3;8(3):466–478. doi: 10.2166/wh.2010.116

Table 5.

Discrimination capacity of SFB, coliforms and C. perfringens spores (CP) for habitats differing in presumptive faecal pollution levels (7 tested pairs)*

Fecal indicators
TC FC E. coli CP SFB
Compared
category
Compared Pairs +/− log10 BCRM +/− log10 BCRM +/− log10 BCRM +/− log10 BCRM +/− log10 BCRM
I BL–BH 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.4 np
BL–OP + 3.7 2.8 + 3.1 + 2.7 (+) np
BH–OP + 3.0 + 2.4 + 2.5 + 2.4 (+) np
II BL–S + 5.6 + 4.9 + 5.1 + 4.4 (+) np
BH–S + 4.9 + 4.4 + 4.5 + 4.0 (+) np
OP–S + 1.9 + 2.0 + 2.0 + 1.7 + 1.8
III US–DS 0.3 0.5 0.7 + 0.6 + 1.4
*

Abbreviations: For BL, BH, OP, US, DS, TC, FC, CP, SFB see Tables 2 and 3; S, pooled stream data set including US and DS.

Mann–Whitney test for pairwise difference, + indicates p < 0.05 while—indicates p > 0.05 and corrected for multiple tests using Bonferroni correction.

log10 BCRM = log10 of the bacteriological concentration ratio of the medians; np = calculation was not possible as SFB were not detectable in BL and BH and thus no algorithm could be applied. However, from a practical point of view a significant difference between not detectable and detected concentrations exists (+). n = 6 pooled sites × 18 to 36 samples per pooled site.