Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 21;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-15

Table 2.

Impact of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases on adequate glycemic control

Logistic regressions on percentage of patients with HbA1c < 6.5%
Variable Odds Ratio 95% confidence intervals P-value

With CVD vs. without CVD 0.62 0.46, 0.82 0.001

Time indicators

 <1 year from index 6.21 3.61, 10.70 <0.001

 1-2 years from index 6.39 3.72, 10.98 <0.001

 2-3 years from index 6.69 3.81, 11.75 <0.001

 3-4 years from index 7.66 4.24, 13.87 <0.001

 >= 4 years from index 5.62 3.02, 10.46 <0.001


Variable Odds Ratio 95% confidence intervals P-value

With CVD vs. without CVD 0.62 0.46, 0.82 0.001

Study period vs. baseline 6.47 3.71, 11.29 <0.001

Years after the index 1.00 0.92, 1.10 0.96


Linear regressions on HbA1c (%)

Variable Coefficient 95% confidence intervals P-value

With CVD vs. without CVD 0.02 -0.10, 0.14 0.75

Time indicators

 <1 year from index -0.80 -0.97, -0.62 <0.001

 1-2 years from index -0.78 -0.96, -0.60 <0.001

 2-3 years from index -0.76 -0.96, -0.57 <0.001

 3-4 years from index -0.88 -1.07, -0.68 <0.001

 >= 4 years from index -0.84 -1.07, -0.60 <0.001


Variable Coefficient 95% confidence intervals P-value

With CVD vs. without CVD 0.02 -0.10, 0.14 0.75

Study period vs. baseline -0.78 -0.97, -0.59 <0.001

Years after the index -0.01 -0.05, 0.03 0.65

Note: CVD: cardiovascular diseases. Other controlled covariates in the regression analyses: concurrent treatment of the HbA1c measurement (metformin+SU combination therapy, metformin+glitazones combination therapy, SU monotherapy, glitazones monotherapy, metformin monotherapy, any therapies with insulin), index SU vs. glitazones, age, gender, Caucasian, duration of diabetes, never used alcohol, physical activity, country, BMI, physician specialty.