Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 5;54(6):2681–2683. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01796-09

TABLE 1.

V36 substitutions observed in patients included in the PROVE2 clinical trial

V36 variant No. (%) of V36 variants in PROVE 2 trial
NS3/4A protease enzyme assaya
HCV replicon assaya
Variant found as dominant (100%) viral population at baseline (n = 241) Variant found as dominant (100%) viral population at the time of breakthrough or relapse (n = 64) Mean IC50 (μM) ± SD Mean fold change in IC50 relative to wild type ± SD Mean Km (μM) ± SD Mean Vmax (μM/μg/s) ± SD Mean EC50 (μM) ± SDc Mean fold change in EC50 relative to wild type ± SD Mean relative replication capacity ± SDd
V36 (wild type) 227 (94) 40 (62.5) 0.6 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.5 10.1 ± 6.1 0.0026 ± 0.0007 0.4 ± 0.1 1.0 100
V36M 2 (0.8) 18 (28.1) 3.0 ± 0.8 5.0 ± 1.8 5.1 ± 1.3 0.0018 ± 0.0002 3.4 ± 0.8b 7.0 ± 1.6b 77 ± 12b
V36A 0 (0) 4 (6.3) NAe NA NA NA 3.6 ± 1.1b 7.4 ± 2.2b 104 ± 26b
V36L 10 (4.1) 6 (9.4) 1.3 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 0.6 4.6 ± 1.0 0.0022 ± 0.0002 1.1 ± 0.2b 2.2 ± 0.4b NTf
V36C 0 (0) 1 (1.6) 2.4 ± 1.3 4.0 ± 1.3 6.4 ± 2.6 0.0023 ± 0.0004 3.8 ± 0.5 9.5 ± 0.9 98 ± 9
a

Results were calculated based on three independent experiments.

b

Data from Zhou et al. (6); fold change calculated with respect to their wild-type sequence.

c

Data generated with a stable replicon.

d

Data generated with a transient replicon.

e

NA, no soluble protein obtained.

f

NT, not tested.