Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 29;78(6):2846–2856. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01448-09

TABLE 2.

P. gingivalis genes differentially expressed in the tprA mutant cells placed in a mouse subcutaneous chamber compared to those expressed in the wild-type cellsa

TIGR no. Identification Avg. fold difference
Downregulated genes
    PG0100 Hypothetical protein 0.59
    PG0162 RNA polymerase sigma-70 factor, ECF subfamily 0.57
    PG0591 ISPg5, transposase Orf2 0.63
    PG0756 Hypothetical protein 0.47
    PG1055 Thiol protease 0.36
    PG1972 Hemagglutinin protein HagB 0.63
    PG1975 Hemagglutinin protein HagC 0.64
    PG2100 (tapC) Immunoreactive 63-kDa PG102 antigen 0.34
    PG2101 (tapB) Hypothetical protein 0.25
    PG2102 (tapA) Immunoreactive 61-kDa PG91 antigen 0.51
    PG2103 Hypothetical protein 0.24
    PG2214 Hypothetical protein 0.57
Upregulated genes
    PG0327 Hypothetical protein 1.92
    PG0373 Hypothetical protein 1.72
    PG0546 Hypothetical protein 1.83
    PG0635 Ribosomal protein L11 methyltransferase 1.69
    PG0656 Ribosomal protein L34 2.02
    PG0722 Hypothetical protein 2.93
    PG0969 S-Adenosylmethionine:tRNA ribosyltransferase-isomerase (putative protein) 1.98
    PG1532 Hypothetical protein 1.92
    PG1866 Hypothetical protein 1.93
    PG2006 Hypothetical protein 1.69
    PG2225 Hypothetical protein 1.63
a

Mouse subcutaneous chamber experiments were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Total RNA was extracted from strains W83 (wild type) and KDP159 (tprA::erm). The extracted total RNA was analyzed by using a microarray as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers in the “Avg fold difference” column indicate the levels of gene expression in the tprA mutant versus the wild-type strain. The cutoff ratio for the levels of difference was 1.5.