Skip to main content
. 2010 May 21;81(3):324–330. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.480934

Summary of the 4 osteoarthritis patients at the time of the primary operation, their failure mode and months to revision in whom the femoral head and the resurfacing implant were removed for analysis

Case no. Age/Gender Implant Mode of failure Months to revision Side/Bilateral Cement type/Viscosity
1 59/M BHR 46-mm head, 52-mm cup Fracture of the femoral neck 46 Right Simplex/Low viscosity
2 62/M Durom 54-mm head, 60-mm cup Loosening of the femoral component 7 Right Simplex/Low viscosity
3 55/F ASR 40-mm head, 45-mm cup Fracture of the femoral neck 2 Left/Bilateral Palacos/High viscosity
4 58/M BHR 50-mm head, 56-mm cup Fracture of the femoral neck 24 Right/Bilateral Simplex/Low viscosity

F: female; M: male; BHR: Birmingham Hip Resurfacing implant (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TE), Durom (Zimmer, Winterthur, Switzerland); ASR = Articular Surface Replacement (DePuy, Leeds, UK).