Skip to main content
. 2010 May 21;81(3):354–360. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.487241

Table 3.

Mobilization and patient satisfaction

Outcome Group A median (range) n Group P median (range) n p-value
Knee extension (degrees)
 Preop. 5 (0–30) 23 5 (0–20) 19
 24 h postop. 10 (0–20) 24 10 (0–20) 19 0.4
 48 h postop. 10 (0–15) 23 10 (0–15) 21 0.4
 Discharge 10 (0–10) 24 10 (5–10) 23 0.01
 3 days postop. 10 (0–15) 22 10 (0–15) 22 0.4
 3 months postop. 5 (0–10) 20 5 (0–15) 23 0.6
Knee flexion (degrees)
 Preop. 120 (90–153) 23 120 (100–135) 19
 24 h postop. 90 (60–105) 24 60 (30–85) 23 < 0.001
 48 h postop. 75 (50–105) 23 60 (40–90) 22 0.003
 Discharge 85 (60–115) 24 75 (60–100) 23 0.2
 3 days postop. 75 (60–110) 22 62 (45–90) 22 0.09
 3 months postop. 112 (100–125) 20 110 (90–130) 22 0.3
TUG test (seconds)
 Preop. 10 (6–26) 21 9 (6–28) 17
 48 h postop. 22 (10–51) 15 27 (8–35) 8 na a
 3 days postop. 18 (9–49) 16 20 (8–80) 12 na a
 7 days postop. 18 (10–48) 24 17 (7–65) 21 0.8
 14 days postop. 14 (7–42) 22 10 (6–25) 22 0.5
 3 months postop 8 (6–16) 20 7 (5–19) 23 0.8
Patient satisfaction
 1 day postop. 4 (2–4) 23 3 (1–4) 20 < 0.001
 7 days postop. 3 (1–4) 23 3 (1–4) 20 0.02 b
Oxford knee score
 Preop. 39 (26–49) 23 40 (27–42) 20
 14 days postop. 33 (18–42) 20 32 (25–45) 21 0.9
 3 months postop. 16 (12–37) 20 16 (12–28) 23 0.8
EQ-5D
 Preop 0.66 (0.06–0.80) 23 0.20 (0.03–0.73) 23
 3 months postop. 1 (0.59–1) 21 1 (0.69–1) 23 1

n: number of patients who participated varied depending on patients' ability to cooperate.

TUG test: Timed up and go test.

a na: not applicable. No statistical calculations were done due to the small number of patients in each group.

b Patient satisfaction: Excellent = 4, good = 3, inadequate = 2, poor = 1. In group A, 20/23 scored 3–4 as compared to 12/20 in group P 7 days postoperatively.

Oxford knee score: 12 (the best possible) to 60 (the worst possible).

EQ-5D health outcome: 1 = perfect health; 0 = poor health.