Table 2.
Adult locomotor activity rhythms with UAS-Mef2-EnR and UAS-Mef2RNAi
| Genotype | Period (h) | Power | n | AR | Loss of rhythms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAS-Mef2-EnR/+ | 23.7 ± 0.1 | 52.4 ± 5.7 | 33 | 1 | |
| Pdf-Gal4/+;Pdf-Gal4/UAS-Mef2-EnR | 23.6 ± 0.4 | 32.9 ± 6.9 | 18 | 7 | |
| tim(UAS)-Gal4/+;UAS-Mef2-EnR/+ | 25.4 ± 0.7 | 29.2 ± 7.4 | 14 | 5 | |
| UAS-Mef2RNAi/+ | 23.8 ± 0.2 | 80.7 ± 16.9 | 23 | 0 | |
| Pdf-Gal4/+;UAS-dcr-2/UAS-Mef2RNAi | 25.0 ± 0.4 | 32.6 ± 5.2 | 25 | 3 | |
| tim(UAS)-Gal4/+;UAS-dcr-2/UAS-Mef2RNAi | 23.7 ± 0.5 | 50 ± 4.7 | 36 | 25 |
Lomb–Scargle analysis of adult locomotor activity showing period (in hours) with SEM, power (to indicate the strength of the rhythm), the number of flies analyzed (n), and the numbers of either arrhythmic flies (AR) or flies that were arrhythmic from days 7 to 12 in the assay despite starting off as rhythmic.