Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2009 Oct;38(2):105–114. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9139-y

Table 3.

Multiple regression models predicting HADS depression scores including intrinsic religiosity, total SWB scores and subscale scores, and the final mediational model.

Source Beta t p
Model 1- Intrinsic religiosity
Age .10 2.36 .02
Marital Status .01 .16 .87
Stage of Disease .00 −.01 .99
Time since dx .10 2.23 .03
Hormone Therapy −.09 −.1.98 .05
FACT-G −.60 −11.40 .0001
FACT-Prostate −.06 −1.30 .19
HADS Anxiety .22 5.20 .0001
Intrinsic religiosity −.08 −2.18 .03
Model 2- SWB subscales
Age .10 2.50 .01
Marital Status .00 −.07 .94
Stage of Disease .00 .03 .98
Time since dx .09 2.18 .03
Hormone Therapy −.05 −1.25 .21
FACT-G −.46 −8.29 .0001
FACT-P −.06 −1.47 .14
HADS Anxiety .13 3.18 .01
SWB: Meaning/peace −.29 −5.80 .0001
SWB: Faith .00 .04 .97
Model 3- Mediational Model
Age .10 2.47 .01
Marital Status .0 −.12 .91
Stage of Disease −.01 −.18 .86
Time since dx .09 2.23 .03
Hormone Therapy −.05 −1.16 .25
FACT-G −.46 −8.25 .0001
FACT-P −.07 −1.52 .13
HADS Anxiety .14 3.39 .002
SWB: Meaning/peace −.30 −5.90 .0001
SWB: Faith .07 1.13 .26
Intrinsic religiosity −.08 −1.48 .14

Note:

M1 R2=.60, F (9, 305) = 50.31, p = .0001

M2 R2=.64, F (10, 309) = 54.06, p = .0001

M3 R2=.64, F (11, 303) = 48.84, p = .0001