. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Appl Dev Psychol. 2010 May;31(3):231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.01.001

Table 3.

Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Weight Status and Positive Friendship Quality Predicting Anger.

Step, Predictors		B	SE B	β	F	R²	f²
1.	Sex	0.02	0.05	0.04	(4, 114) = 0.55, ns	0.02	0.02
	Race	−0.01	0.03	−0.03
	Income	−0.03	0.04	−0.07
	Victimization	0.40	0.38	0.10
2.	Sex	−0.03	0.06	−0.05	(2, 112) = 1.49, ns	0.04	0.02
	Race	−0.02	0.03	−0.05
	Income	−0.03	0.04	−0.07
	Victimization	0.20	0.39	0.05
	Weight Status	−0.01	0.05	−0.02
	Positive Quality	0.43	0.25	0.19
3.	Sex	−0.03	0.06	−0.05	(1, 111) = 9.52, p < .004	0.12	0.09
	Race	−0.02	0.03	−0.05
	Income	−0.03	0.04	−0.07
	Victimization	0.21	0.38	0.05
	Weight Status	−0.01	0.05	−0.02
	Positive Quality	−0.34	0.34	−0.15
	Weight Status × Positive Quality	1.26	0.41	0.44^*

Note. Weight status coded as 0 = overweight, 1 = average weight.

p < .05.