Table 4.
Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Weight Status & Friendship Quality Predicting Emotion-focused Coping.
| Step, Predictors | B | SE B | β | F | R2 | f2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Sex | −0.04 | 0.02 | −0.16 | (4, 114) = 3.71, p < .008 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Race | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 | ||||
| Income | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.13 | ||||
| Victimization | 0.51 | 0.16 | 0.29* | ||||
| 2. | Sex | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.11 | (2, 112) = 1.30, ns | 0.14 | 0.02 |
| Race | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.11 | ||||
| Income | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.12 | ||||
| Victimization | 0.56 | 0.16 | 0.32* | ||||
| Weight Status | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.06 | ||||
| Positive Quality | −0.15 | 0.10 | −0.15 | ||||
| 3. | Sex | −0.03 | 0.02 | −0.11 | (1, 111) = 5.29, p < .03 | 0.17 | 0.04 |
| Race | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.11 | ||||
| Income | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.13 | ||||
| Victimization | 0.56 | 0.16 | 0.32* | ||||
| Weight Status | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.06 | ||||
| Positive Quality | −0.39 | 0.15 | −0.40* | ||||
| Weight Status × Positive Quality | 0.40 | 0.17 | 0.32* | ||||
Note. Weight status coded as 0 = overweight, 1 = average weight.
p < .05.