Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 1;37(3):254–269. doi: 10.1007/s10488-009-0244-9

Table 6.

Hierarchical linear models predicting caregiver EBP composite scores

Predictor variable Regression coefficient (standard error) P-value
Child demographics (n = 762 for level 1; n = 180 for level 2; n = 81 for level 3)
 Gendera .053 (.090) .556
 Age −.023 (.015) .136
Caregiver/family sociodemographics (n = 741 for level 1; n = 173 for level 2; n = 77 for level 3)
 Age .000 (.003) .964
 Race/ethnicityb .036 (.089) .682
 Education (reference group = some high school)
  Some college −.059 (.111) .596
  College/grad school .135 (.134) .317
  Income −.000 (.000) .143
Child clinical characteristics (n = 762 for level 1; n = 180 for level 2; n = 81 for level 3)
 Eyberg child behavior inventory .002 (.001) .053
 Primary diagnosis (reference group = DBD)
  ADHD −.119 (.112) .292
  Mood .004 (.117) .975
  Anxiety −.171 (.164) .299
  Other −.014 (.169) .933
Caregiver psychosocial functioning (n = 534 for level 1; n = 124 for level 2; n = 54 for level 3)
 Drug abuse screening test −.003 (.053) .949
 Alcohol use disorders identification test .002 (.012) .854
 Center for epidemiological studies-depression −.006 (.005) .238
 Brief symptom inventory −.001 (.005) .867
Family functioning (n = 624 for level 1; n = 143 for level 2; n = 63 for level 3)
 Family relationship inventory .005 (.010) .587
 Family empowerment scale-family .004 (.008) .595
 Family empowerment scale-community −.002 (.007) .795
 Family empowerment scale-systems −.010 (.006) .105
 Caregiver strain questionnaire .073 (.050) .151
Therapist demographics (n = 762 for level 1; n = 180 for level 2; n = 81 for level 3)
 Gendera .006 (.005) .759
 Age .111 (.125) .379
 Raceb −.122 (.099) .222
Therapist level of experience (n = 762 for level 1; n = 180 for level 2; n = 81 for level 3)
 Months in practice −.002 (.001) .054
 Positionc .071 (.120) .556
 Licensured .168 (.127) .191
Therapist background (n = 762 for level 1; n = 180 for level 2; n = 81 for level 3)
 Discipline (reference group = MFT)
  Psychology .026 (.132) .846
  Social work −.171 (.114) .136
 Orientation (reference group = CBT)
  Family systems −.061 (.123) .624
  Psychodynamic/humanistic .178 (.116) .129
  Eclectic/other .188 (.136) .170

Note: Robust standard error solution is reported, which controls for non-normality in the variables. Each model was run with HLM3 with tape as level one, child/caregiver as level two, and therapist as level three. Regression coefficients reported are unstandardized

DBD disruptive behavior disorders (oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder), ADHD attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, MFT marriage and family therapy, CBT cognitive/behavioral or behavioral

a0 = Male; 1 = Female

b0 = White; 1 = Nonwhite

c0 = Trainee; 1 = Staff

d0 = Unlicensed; 1 = Licensed