Table 2.

Logistic Regression Predicting Perception of "Most Important" Environmental Problem, Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance Site, Bushbuckridge, South Africa.^*

	Dirty rivers/dams		Salty/dirty tap water		Litter / Refuse		Soil erosion
Household Characteristics
Household Size	−0.23		0.01		0.09		−0.19
Female head	1.45		0.64		−1.35		−1.55
Age of head	0.01		0.01		0.01		0.01
Education of head	−0.04	*	−0.06		0.15		−0.03
Young household	0.56		−1.25		−0.34		−0.17
Older household	−2.15		−2.10		…		−4.12	**
Asset Index	0.49		0.02		−0.42		−0.21
Respondent Characteristics
Female	−1.15		2.72	***	0.05		1.58	*
Place Characteristics
Ireagh A/B	ref		ref		ref		ref
Croquetlawn	…		−2.48	*	1.08	**	0.45
Cunningmore A	−0.44		0.08		1.49		1.42
Cunningmore B	…		−4.59	***	…		…
Justicia A	1.05		−1.10		2.47	*	0.16
Kildare A	2.27	**	…		…		…
Kildare B	…		…		…		…
Lilydale A	…		…		…		…
Lilydale B	…		…		…		…
Constant	−2.45	*	−4.05	*	−3.79		−1.61
Model χ2; Prob>χ2	20.67;0.04		23.01;0.02		18.56;0.05		14.54;0.20
χ2 village variables = 0; Prob>χ2	3.52;0.32		17.23;0.00		4.95;0.17		2.74;0.43
Percent Correctly Classified	82.31		84.35		86.39		90.48
N	149		149		149		149

^*only outcomes noted by at least 10% of respondents are presented

^*p<0.05

^**p<0.01

^***p<0.001

^*models lacking overall significance in grey.

^*weights applied to adjust for stratified sampling by household adult mortality experience.