Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 2;27(4):921–933. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp298

Table 3.

Splitting Time, Effective Population Size Estimates and CIs in Different Studies.

Parameter Caswell et al. (2008)a Won and Hey (2005)b Becquet and Przeworski (2007)c This Studyd
Eastern/central ancestor split time (Ma) 0.22 (0.14–1.40) 0.093 (0.041–0.157)
Common chimpanzee ancestor split time (Ma) 0.44 (0.37–0.51) 0.42 (0.26–0.63) 0.38 (0.27–0.94) 0.46 (0.35–0.65)
Common bonobo split time (Ma) 1.11 (0.98–1.24) 0.87e (0.59–1.33) 0.77e (0.58–1.00) 0.93 (0.68–1.54)
Eastern Ne 16,600e (5,100–71,800) 8,200 (4,600–13,100)
Central Ne 118,000 (91,000–159,000) 18,900e (12,800–30,000) 23,100e (8,500–59,700) 26,900 (16,100–43,900)
Western Ne 9,100 (8,100–10,000) 6,000e (4,000–8,400) 10,100e (7,700–21,100) 7,400 (5,400–10,000)
Bonobo Ne 10,400e (7,800–15,200) 8,500 (6,400–11,000)
Eastern and central ancestor Ne 46,000 (33,500–75,100) 31,600 (18,600–54,000)
Common chimpanzee ancestor Ne 16,000 (12,400–19,600) 4,600 (180–9,900) 13,000e (2,200–22,400) 7,100 (3,500–12,500)
Common chimpanzee and bonobo ancestor Ne 20,900 (16,400–25,500) 11,900e (23–22,200) 32,900 (22,200–48,700) 16,800 (7,500–28,000)
a

Split times adjusted for 6-My (rather than a 7 My) human/chimpanzee divergence. Intervals are 90% credible intervals estimated from bootstrap analyses.

b

Intervals are 90% highest posterior density values estimated from marginal posterior densities.

c

Split times adjusted for 6-My (rather than a 7 My) human/chimpanzee divergence. Intervals are 95% CIs.

d

Four-population model (fig. 5). CIs are 95% highest posterior density intervals estimated from marginal posterior densities.

e

The original study provided estimates from two or three pairwise analyses. Estimates are means from the original study. CIs represent the lowest and highest individual values reported from the pairwise analyses.